ro2019

Logo

Workshop on Research Objects 2019

View the Project on GitHub ResearchObject/ro2019

Open Peer Reviews

RO2019 encourages open peer review, and recommend that reviewers are named and attributed; however reviewers may be anonymous if so desired.

See also review template and reviews by GitHub.

Note: The list of peer reviews is currently under construction, as reviews are transcribed manually from EasyChair

Articles

Abstracts

Posters

Pending deadline

Announcements

The Call for Papers was announced through EasyChair, Twitter, organizational and project websites, multiple mailing lists and newsletters, at related workshop presentations, in the RO-Crate calls and to the RO2019 Programme Committee.

Announcements were sent out roughly at:

Existing contacts in projects, eScience 2019 organizers and eScience 2019 programme committee were approached personally and invited to submit for peer review.

Submissions

Submissions were received through EasyChair or GitHub.

Received submissions:

In the submission guide, authors were requested to deposit their abstract or article to the Zenodo ResearchObject community and only include the DOI/URL to Zenodo in the EasyChair/GitHub submission.

Reviewers

After the extended deadline, EasyChair was opened for bidding, where 8 of the PC members indicated papers they preferred to review, being assigned on average 1.4 “Yes” bids papers and 1.0 “Maybe”/”No” papers. 8 assignments were given to PC or chair members who did not bid.

# Assigned Reviews Yes (assigned) Maybe (assigned) No (assigned) Bid Yes (bid) Maybe (bid) Conflict Fairness
a 1 1 1     3 1   100
b                   100
c                   100
d 2 2     2         -100
e 3   1 1 1 1 3 1 6
f 2 2 2     3 1   100
g   1               100
h                   100
i 2 2 1 1   1 5 1 60
j 2 2     2         -100
k 1 1     1         -100
l 2 2 1 1   1 3   60
m 3 3 2 1   4 2   73
n 4 4 1   3 1 1   -50
o 3 3     3         -100
p                 1 100
q                   100
r 2 2 2     3     100

(Table adapted from EasyChair, one row per randomized PC member)

Each submission was assigned to 2 members of the RO2019 programme committee, with additional assignments if PC members were at risk of unresponsiveness. The chairs added fall-back reviews if PC members did not respond by deadline.

The decision per submission was done by silent consensus by individual chairs where reviews where consistent. One submission was discussed further and authors requested to revise before acceptance.